Some Ludwig posts were beyond offensive; they are disqualifying

April 11, 2025

In last week’s Press, Don Ludwig discussed his history of town activities at length, and noted that he “never let any national political opinion enter the way [he] treats and makes decisions for the citizens and employees of Harvard.”  This may be correct but is irrelevant; the overwhelmingly negative reaction to Ludwig’s posts is not about “national political opinion;” it is about the nature of his opinions about wide swathes of his fellow town residents.

A letter to the editor endorsing Ludwig’s candidacy for reelection to the Select Board praised his experience and says that he “made a mistake a few weeks ago and has apologized for it.” Similarly, in an earlier letter, Ludwig apologized for making “a mistake.” This is disingenuous at best: Ludwig did not make “a [singular] mistake” “a few weeks ago.”  In fact, he made literally hundreds of intentional mistakes of the same kind over many months, a clear, consistent pattern of behavior.  Most of his posts were offensive to many of us, but not disqualifying; many, however, were misogynistic, racist, and homophobic. Such posts are beyond offensive; they are disqualifying. Someone with such beliefs simply has no place in town leadership. He should have resigned from the Select Board; he did not, so we must make sure that he is not reelected.

Billy Salter
Elm Street

Related Posts

Go toTop